Skip to main content
for

Northwestern Law professors available on upcoming Supreme Court rulings

Constitutional law professors from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law are available to comment on a number of highly anticipated Supreme Court rulings expected over the next few weeks including June Medical Services LLC v. Russo, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP and Trump v. Vance, among others.

Northwestern Law professors Robert Bennett and Andrew Koppelman (see below) filed amicus briefs in two of the major cases before the Court: Chiafalo v. Washington and Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, respectively. Both are available to comment on these particular cases.

Ronald Allen is the John Henry Wigmore Professor of Law and a constitutional and criminal law expert. He can be reached at rjallen@law.northwestern.edu.

Chiafalo v. Washington
Robert Bennett, the Nathaniel L. Nathanson Professor of Law Emeritus and a constitutional law scholar, has written extensively on the Electoral College. He filed an amicus briefin the “faithless electors” case, Chiafalo v. Washington. He can be reached at r-bennett@law.northwestern.edu.

Tonja Jacobi is the Stanford Clinton Sr. and Zylpha Kilbride Clinton Research Professor of Law. Jacobi recently launched ScotusOA, a website dedicated to empirical analysis of Supreme Court oral arguments. She can be reached at t-jacobi@law.northwestern.edu.

Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia
Andrew Koppelman, the John Paul Stevens Professor of Law, filed an amicus briefin Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, a major case related to federal protections for LGBT employees. He is also the author of “Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty? The Unnecessary Conflict” (Oxford University Press, June 2020). He can be reached at akoppelman@law.northwestern.edu.