In October 2019, a high-energy neutrino slammed into Antarctica. The neutrino, which was remarkably hard to detect, piqued astronomers’ interest: what could generate such a powerful particle?
Researchers traced the neutrino back to a supermassive black hole that had just ripped apart and swallowed a star. Known as a tidal disruption event (TDE), AT2019dsg occurred just months earlier — in April 2019 — in the same region of the sky where the neutrino had come from. The monstrously violent event must have been the source of the powerful particle, astronomers said.
But new research casts doubt on that claim.
In a study published this month in the Astrophysical Journal, researchers at Northwestern University and the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, present extensive new radio observations and data on AT2019dsg, enabling the team to calculate the energy emitted by the event. The findings show AT2019dsg generated nowhere near the energy needed for the neutrino; in fact, what it spewed out was quite “ordinary,” the team concludes.
Black holes are messy eaters
While it may seem counterintuitive, black holes do not always swallow everything in reach.
“Black holes are not like vacuum cleaners,” said Yvette Cendes, a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Astrophysics who led the study.
When a star wanders too close to a black hole, gravitational forces begin to stretch, or “spaghettify,” the star, Cendes explained. Eventually, the elongated material spirals around the black hole and heats up, creating a flash in the sky that astronomers can spot from millions of light years away.
“But when there’s too much material, black holes can’t eat it all smoothly at once,” said Kate Alexander, a study co-author and NASA Einstein fellow at Northwestern’s Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA), who calls black holes “messy eaters.” “Some of the gas gets spewed back out during this process — like when babies eat, some of the food ends up on the floor or the walls.”
These leftovers get flung back into space in the form of an outflow, or jet — which, if powerful enough, could theoretically generate a subatomic particle known as a neutrino.
An unlikely source for neutrinos
Using the Very Large Array in New Mexico and Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile, the team was able to observe AT2019dsg, some 750 million light years away, for more than 500 days after the black hole had started consuming the star. The extensive radio observations make AT2019dsg the most well-studied TDE to date and revealed that the radio brightness peaked around 200 days after the event began.
According to the data, the total amount of energy in the outflow was equivalent to the energy radiated by the Sun over the course of 30 million years. While that may sound impressive, the powerful neutrino spotted on Oct. 1, 2019, would require a source 1,000 times more energetic.
“Instead of seeing the bright jet of material needed for this, we see a fainter radio outflow of material,” Alexander explained. “Instead of a powerful firehose, we see a soft wind.”
Cendes added, “If this neutrino somehow came from AT2019dsg, it begs the question: Why haven’t we spotted neutrinos associated with supernovae at this distance or closer? They are much more common and have the same energy velocities.”
The team concludes it’s unlikely that the neutrino came from this particular TDE. If it did, however, astronomers are far from understanding TDEs and how they launch neutrinos.
“We’re probably going to check in on this one again,” said Cendes, who believes there’s still much to learn. “This particular black hole is still feeding.”
TDE AT2019dsg was first discovered on April 9, 2019, by the Zwicky Transient Facility in Southern California. The neutrino, known as IceCube-191001A, was detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory in the South Pole six months later.
The study, “Radio observations of an ordinary outflow from the tidal disruption event AT2019dsg,” was supported by the National Science Foundation and NASA (award numbers HST-HF2-51403.001-A and NAS5-26555). Northwestern co-authors include Tarraneh Eftekhari, a postdoctoral fellow at CIERA.
This article was provided by the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian.